|
Post by hanover on Oct 9, 2006 23:09:05 GMT
In 'Brotherly Love', I don't see how Maggie Harvey could have killed the second prostitute (Joyce Watkins).
Two reasons:
1. We are told that Joyce's body had traces of semen, from unprotected sex shortly before her death, whose DNA matched that found on the first victim, Jane McIlvanney, who was definitely killed by Maggie's husband David.
2. At the time Joyce is killed, Maggie and brother-in-law Michael are being interrogated by Fitz at the police station, while David Harvey is already in custody. The screenplay switches between the interrogation scene, and those of Joyce's battered body tumbling down the stairs outside her apartment.
Given the evidence, that both Fitz and the police ultimately attribute the killing to Maggie makes no sense to me. I know that Maggie confesses to that effect, but then she also says that she killed Jean (which Fitz correctly reasons is to keep her husband out of prison, so their children will be left at least one parent).
Or am I missing something?
Thanks to anybody who can clarify.
David
Footnote: I'm posting this here because I can't work out how to post on the 'Cracker - The Series (Spoilers)' forum.
|
|
|
Post by Hari Seldon on Oct 11, 2006 22:36:26 GMT
I haven't seen that eppie too long to know it by heart. But I remember the first time I thought the man killed the first, his brother the priest killed the second and the wife killed the third. When rewatching the show I noticed that this wasn't the case, and couldn't discover a flaw. But I sure will watch it again this year
|
|